ext_237236 ([identity profile] astralavator.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] crankyoldman 2008-06-05 08:39 pm (UTC)

Well, his example about the company didn’t make much sense because an average everyday person won’t have the funding to buy himself a significant vote from a major corporation and if they did why would they waste resource buying into a company to have the company doing their lobbying rather than doing it in a more traditional way of bribing.

It seems a bit misleading to say feudalism is then next step from capitalism as didn’t capitalism lead to the end of feudalism or so my old capitalist history books say. ^_~

Not that after capitalism declines it won’t because a feudalism but it doesn’t carry the same type of implications.

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting